Edition

This is a permanent edition. It carries the briefing exactly as published on this date and does not change.

ICO Emphasises Strong Data Protection Governance for Facial Recognition in Policing

The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) on 18 August 2026 published a blog post detailing its 2025 examination of police use of facial recognition technology (FRT) in England and Wales. This examination revealed inconsistencies in data protection compliance across five audited police forces, despite general adherence to lawful basis identification and breach reporting for live facial recognition (LFR) deployments.

The ICO's 2025 examination of police use of facial recognition technology (FRT) in England and Wales found significant changes in deployment, including rapid expansion of live facial recognition (LFR) to forces without prior experience. Research published last year showed public support for FRT is conditional on accuracy, lack of bias, respect for privacy, and clear societal benefit. These findings reinforce the necessity of robust governance, which the ICO states is not optional.

Over the past year, the ICO proactively audited five police forces, with the Metropolitan Police Service audit scheduled for later this year. The audits revealed inconsistencies in data protection compliance, though forces generally had a lawful basis identified and documented for LFR deployments and had breach reporting procedures in place. Compliance rates were generally higher for LFR compared to retrospective facial recognition (RFR). Areas requiring urgent attention include ensuring clear senior oversight, accountability, and training for staff, maintaining clear records of personal information use, ensuring appropriate sources and retention limits for RFR images, and checking system accuracy to reduce bias risks. The audited forces engaged constructively and committed to addressing identified issues, submitting action plans. The ICO is working with the National Police Chiefs’ Council (NPCC) to drive consistent improvement across all forces and will share findings with Police Scotland and the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI).

In 2025, bias in the algorithm used by UK police forces for facial recognition searches within the Police National Database was reported, following testing by the National Physics Lab. The ICO raised concerns with the Home Office and NPCC, who have put mitigations in place including staff training, oversight reporting, and equality impact assessments, alongside plans to replace the algorithm. The ICO continues to monitor cases of detriment and engage with relevant bodies, reserving the right to take further regulatory action if warranted.

ICO audit findings

Who this binds
Police forces in England and Wales, under UK GDPR and Part 3 of the Data Protection Act 2018. The ICO's 107 recommendations are advisory.
What changed
The ICO's audits of five police forces identified 107 recommendations for improving data protection compliance and best practice, all of which were accepted or partially accepted by the audited forces.
What to check
Organisations should review the ICO's audit findings and recommendations to assess their own data protection governance frameworks for similar technologies.
What this does not mean
This briefing does not mean that the ICO has issued a blanket ban on facial recognition technology for policing or that all police forces are non compliant; rather, it highlights areas for improvement in data protection governance.

Not settled: The government is considering the legislative framework and oversight arrangements for law enforcement use of biometrics, facial recognition and similar technologies, indicating potential future changes to the regulatory landscape.

Send this to your team

The Information Commissioner's Office has published audit findings from its 2025 examination of police use of facial recognition technology in England and Wales, identifying 107 recommendations for improved data protection governance that all police forces should consider.

Today's question

According to the ICO's 2025 examination of police use of facial recognition technology in England and Wales, which area was identified as requiring urgent attention for improved data protection compliance?

  1. Ensuring clear senior oversight, accountability, and training for staff.
  2. Revising the lawful basis for all live facial recognition deployments.
  3. Implementing new breach reporting procedures for all police forces.
  4. Developing a consistent national policy for all data retention limits.

Answer this question on the site

Worth knowing

  1. FTC Extends Public Comment Period for Proposed Policy Statement on Personalized Pricing

    The FTC's extended comment period on personalised pricing signals its intent to scrutinise how companies use consumer data for differential pricing practices.

  2. Delaware Updates Personal Data Privacy Act with Expanded Sensitive Data Definition and Lowered Applicability Thresholds

    Organizations processing personal data in Delaware must reassess their compliance programs against the updated DPDPA, particularly regarding sensitive data handling and revised applicability criteria.

  3. European Commission Designates ChatGPT, Reddit, and Roblox as Very Large Online Platforms Under Digital Services Act

    Companies operating large online platforms or search engines with significant EU user bases must prepare to meet the enhanced obligations of the DSA, including systemic risk assessments and mitigation strategies, by the upcoming deadline.

  4. US and Canadian Court Records Breached Following Thomson Reuters Incident

    Privacy professionals in the legal sector must ensure their organisations have robust incident response plans for third party data processors like Thomson Reuters, given the potential exposure of confidential court data.

  5. China Issues New Rules on Cyberspace Security Inspection Consolidating Police Authority

    Companies operating in China must review and update their cybersecurity and data protection compliance programs to align with the expanded inspection authority of the MPS, ensuring readiness for potential audits and enforcement actions.

Compiled that morning from regulator, court and authority sources. Primary sources are linked on every story.